---

 

 

---

Voting

The concurring vote of four board members is required to:

1. Reverse any decision of the Zoning Enforcement Officer,
2. Approve any application, or
3. Grant any variance. [8-7]

---

Powers and Duties

Zoning Board of Appeals has the following powers:

1. To hear and decide appeals from decisions of the Zoning Enforcement Officer;
2. To grant variances from the application of the zoning regulations. The variance power is limited to extraordinary situations and must:
   1. Be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning regulations;
   2. Consider the public health, safety, convenience, welfare and property values;
   3. Be used only with parcels having unusual conditions that cause “exceptional difficulty or unusual hardship;” and
   4. Must not be used if the regulations provide that certain prohibited uses may not be permitted by variance; [8-6]
3. To hear and decide on special permits and special exemptions where that power is conferred on the Zoning Board of Appeals by the zoning regulations;

---

Variances

• Applications for variances are the most common matters brought before the Zoning Board of Appeals.
• The Zoning Board of Appeals is the only board that can vary the application of the zoning regulations. The regulations cannot be varied by the Zoning Commission or the Zoning Enforcement Officer.
• The power to grant a variance allows the Zoning Board of Appeals to stand between the public and individual property owners to protect the latter from
  unnecessary hardship that strict enforcement of the zoning regulations would impose.
• To vary the application of the zoning regulations, a parcel of land must have unusual conditions not generally found in the district, which would make
  development in accord with the regulations extremely difficult.
• These unusual conditions must create “exceptional difficulty” or “unusual hardship,” however CT courts have found “exceptional difficulty” “too lacking in precision of meaning.” Therefore, the standard commonly used by boards of appeals for granting variances is that of “unusual hardship.”

---

About “Unusual Hardship”

Numerous court cases have further defined what does or does not constitute “unusual hardship.” Courts have ruled that:

• The hardship must be unique and different in kind from those generally affecting properties in the same zoning district;
• Economic hardship, such as financial loss, is not a proper basis for granting a variance;
• Where applications of the zoning regulations greatly decrease or practically destroy property value, variances should be granted;
• Variances should only be granted sparingly and where the general purpose of the zoning plan will not be undermined.
• Variances should be based on the condition of the land not the owner. (In 1993, the CGS was amended to clearly provide that variances run with the land and not the owner or applicant.)
• The hardship must not be self-created by the current owner or a predecessor in title

---